| |
Main
Date: 29 Jun 2007 13:28:09
From: Borked Pseudo Mailed
Subject: Darkies working in East Bay Starbucks?
|
I went to my local Starbucks in an overwhelmingly
White suburb in the extended East BAY.
Since they are located in a Safeway Store,
SAFEWAY controls the hiring of employees.
There were three Africoons behind the counter.
Why can't Safeway hire White Americans to
serve White Americans? Do they have a thing
for negroes? I worry about intentional
contamination so I refuse to ever order
Starbucks again.
|
|
| |
Date: 02 Jul 2007 08:56:53
From: rone
Subject: Re: Darkies working in East Bay Starbucks?
|
In article <1c3592624be79eaac5bcf844dddc3db0@pseudo.borked.net >,
Borked Pseudo Mailed <nobody@pseudo.borked.net > wrote:
>I worry about intentional contamination so I refuse to ever order
>Starbucks again.
Odd that some racist fuck like you would end up with contaminated food.
rone
--
The Famous Pedant-o-Sig!
|
| |
Date: 01 Jul 2007 13:57:26
From: WindsorFox
Subject: Re: Darkies working in East Bay Starbucks?
|
Borked Pseudo Mailed wrote:
> I went to my local Starbucks in an overwhelmingly
> White suburb in the extended East BAY.
>
> Since they are located in a Safeway Store,
> SAFEWAY controls the hiring of employees.
> There were three Africoons behind the counter.
>
> Why can't Safeway hire White Americans to
> serve White Americans? Do they have a thing
> for negroes? I worry about intentional
> contamination so I refuse to ever order
> Starbucks again.
>
Cletis??? Did someone wash your mouth with soap???
--
Roses are red,
Violets are blue.
"Your" a retard. - Herb Tarlek
|
| |
Date: 29 Jun 2007 20:35:36
From: Karen
Subject: Re: Darkies working in East Bay Starbucks?
|
On Jun 29, 12:28 pm, Borked Pseudo Mailed <nob...@pseudo.borked.net >
wrote:
> I went to my local Starbucks in an overwhelmingly
> White suburb in the extended East BAY.
>
> Since they are located in a Safeway Store,
> SAFEWAY controls the hiring of employees.
> There were three Africoons behind the counter.
>
> Why can't Safeway hire White Americans to
> serve White Americans? Do they have a thing
> for negroes? I worry about intentional
> contamination so I refuse to ever order
> Starbucks again.
Starbucks is better off without you.
Karen
|
| | |
Date: 29 Jun 2007 18:19:47
From: George Grapman
Subject: Re: Darkies working in East Bay Starbucks?
|
Karen wrote:
> On Jun 29, 12:28 pm, Borked Pseudo Mailed <nob...@pseudo.borked.net>
> wrote:
>> I went to my local Starbucks in an overwhelmingly
>> White suburb in the extended East BAY.
>>
>> Since they are located in a Safeway Store,
>> SAFEWAY controls the hiring of employees.
>> There were three Africoons behind the counter.
>>
>> Why can't Safeway hire White Americans to
>> serve White Americans? Do they have a thing
>> for negroes? I worry about intentional
>> contamination so I refuse to ever order
>> Starbucks again.
>
> Starbucks is better off without you.
>
> Karen
>
Bet you blame Mexican for your inability to get a decent job.
Too bad I plonked Tim May. I expect him to offer you domestic
partnership with him.
|
| | | |
Date: 29 Jun 2007 19:54:31
From:
Subject: Re: Darkies working in East Bay Starbucks?
|
George Grapman wrote:
>>
> Bet you blame Mexican for your inability to get a decent job.
> Too bad I plonked Tim May. I expect him to offer you domestic
> partnership with him.
Tim already has a domestic partner, his hand.
|
| | | | |
Date: 01 Jul 2007 04:47:45
From:
Subject: Re: Darkies working in East Bay Starbucks?
|
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 19:54:31 -0700, crowley@ymoctl.com wrote:
>George Grapman wrote:
>>>
>> Bet you blame Mexican for your inability to get a decent job.
>> Too bad I plonked Tim May. I expect him to offer you domestic
>> partnership with him.
>
>
> Tim already has a domestic partner, his hand.
Which is, of course. far safer than chancing sex with a homosexual
since they account for more than 50% of all new AIDS cases in the US
every year and have done so for more than a quarter century.
|
| | | | | |
Date: 01 Jul 2007 14:00:11
From: WindsorFox
Subject: Re: Darkies working in East Bay Starbucks?
|
bo_dacious@mactan.org wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 19:54:31 -0700, crowley@ymoctl.com wrote:
>
>> George Grapman wrote:
>>> Bet you blame Mexican for your inability to get a decent job.
>>> Too bad I plonked Tim May. I expect him to offer you domestic
>>> partnership with him.
>>
>> Tim already has a domestic partner, his hand.
>
>
> Which is, of course. far safer than chancing sex with a homosexual
> since they account for more than 50% of all new AIDS cases in the US
> every year and have done so for more than a quarter century.
Ooops, hey dude, you know you forgot to make this post through the
anon remailer. Now we all know who really started this thread. I thought
you were too literate to be the real Cletis.
--
Roses are red,
Violets are blue.
"Your" a retard. - Herb Tarlek
|
| | | | | |
Date: 30 Jun 2007 22:10:56
From: Golden California Girls
Subject: Re: Darkies working in East Bay Starbucks?
|
bo_dacious@mactan.org wrote in ba.food:
> On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 19:54:31 -0700, crowley@ymoctl.com wrote:
>
>> George Grapman wrote:
>>> Bet you blame Mexican for your inability to get a decent job.
>>> Too bad I plonked Tim May. I expect him to offer you domestic
>>> partnership with him.
>>
>> Tim already has a domestic partner, his hand.
>
>
> Which is, of course. far safer than chancing sex with a homosexual
> since they account for more than 50% of all new AIDS cases in the US
> every year and have done so for more than a quarter century.
Hey, you missed cross posting this to la.eats!
|
| | |
Date: 29 Jun 2007 20:44:13
From: AllEmailDeletedImmediately
Subject: Re: Darkies working in East Bay Starbucks?
|
DON'T FEED THE DAMN TROLLS!!!
"Karen" <ksoa650@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1183149336.798849.176690@g37g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> On Jun 29, 12:28 pm, Borked Pseudo Mailed <nob...@pseudo.borked.net>
> wrote:
>> I went to my local Starbucks in an overwhelmingly
>> White suburb in the extended East BAY.
>>
>> Since they are located in a Safeway Store,
>> SAFEWAY controls the hiring of employees.
>> There were three Africoons behind the counter.
>>
>> Why can't Safeway hire White Americans to
>> serve White Americans? Do they have a thing
>> for negroes? I worry about intentional
>> contamination so I refuse to ever order
>> Starbucks again.
>
> Starbucks is better off without you.
>
> Karen
>
|
| | | |
Date: 01 Jul 2007 13:58:29
From: WindsorFox
Subject: Re: Darkies working in East Bay Starbucks?
|
AllEmailDeletedImmediately wrote:
> DON'T FEED THE DAMN TROLLS!!!
>
Why? Trolls have to eat too. Top posting on the other hand....
--
Roses are red,
Violets are blue.
"Your" a retard. - Herb Tarlek
|
| | | | |
Date: 02 Jul 2007 20:29:31
From: kwatq
Subject: Re: Darkies working in East Bay Starbucks?
|
Wow. Are you guys ever politically correct.
Canadians, no doubt.
On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 13:58:29 -0500, WindsorFox wrote:
> AllEmailDeletedImmediately wrote:
>> DON'T FEED THE DAMN TROLLS!!!
>>
>
>
> Why? Trolls have to eat too. Top posting on the other hand....
|
| | | |
Date: 01 Jul 2007 12:27:43
From: Natalie Drest
Subject: Re: Darkies working in East Bay Starbucks?
|
"AllEmailDeletedImmediately" <derjda@hotmail.com > wrote in message
news:xaehi.940$Nw5.31@trndny04...
> DON'T FEED THE DAMN TROLLS!!!
And don't repost their garbage.
>
> "Karen" <ksoa650@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1183149336.798849.176690@g37g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> > On Jun 29, 12:28 pm, Borked Pseudo Mailed <nob...@pseudo.borked.net>
> > wrote:(trash thrown out)
> >
> > Starbucks is better off without you.
> >
> > Karen
> >
>
>
|
|
