Promoting coffee discussion.

Date: 19 Aug 2007 17:55:49
Subject: MI5 Persecution: Fitted up 26/4/96 (765)
Subject: Re: MI5? Please can someone explain what's going on here?
Newsgroups: uk.misc
References: <4l1khm$ > <4l2lhj$>
Organization: Toronto Free-Net

David Stretch ( wrote:
: In article < >,
: Iain L M Hotchkies < > wrote:
: >The (remote) possibility remains that 'Mike Corley' is either
: >not schizophrenic (but is 'pretending' to be so) or 'he' is
: >a product of a number of persons (?psychology students).

: Given other ways in which I have seen people exploit some of The Internet's
: capabilities to disrupt or indulge in sophistry, or to exploit a medium
: that resembles speech without the non-verbal and intonation cues, etc
: as a means of denigrating others, I question your use, albeit in quotes,
: of the word "remote". I'm not saying it isn't remote and therefore it is
: great, I'm just saying that I don't think we can easily classify it as
: remote, moderate, or great.

I think you can build up quite a good picture based on what someone says
and on their posting patterns. I don't think "The Internet" (capitals, no
less) is as opaque a medium as you make it out to be.

: It is not easy to determine the validity of all information on The
: Internet without making use of extra supplementary information.

: We do have the problem, pointed out by someone else, of the possibly
: "too perfect" textbook characteristics of what is being posted.

I explained that one, but I don't mind explaining it again (you don't
mind having it explained again to you, do you now?). The reason my
"symptoms" are such a perfect fit to the textbook is because the people
causing the campaign "fitted me up" in such a way that what they did
would resemble the symptoms of schizophrenia. Hence TV, radio, other
media, people in the streets etc. By a fortunate coincidence (for them)
these mthods of harassment are the ones which offer easiest channels of
access (for them).

It's really quite neat. All it takes is for people to start believing
that the "symptoms" aren't symptoms but reality, though, and the house of
cards collapses in a heap. And there are _lots_ of people now who knoiw
full well what has gone on.

: If harrassment by email, etc, has happened by someone out of the country,
: can a complaint be made that results in arrest or whatever upon that
: person's entry into the country? An interesting point which Mike may be
: able to inform us about, as he's said he will be in the UK in a few weeks
: time.

Picture the scene at the airport;
"I arrest you for being Mike Corley and mailbombing people"

"But my name isn't Corley. Who he? Mailbombing isn't illegal is it? You'd
have to lock up a lot of people if sending annoying email was a crime"


: --
: David Stretch: Greenwood Institute of Child Health, Univ. of Leicester, UK.
: Phone:+44 (0)116-254-6100 Fax:+44 (0)116-254-4127

: context-free parts of articles, conversations and things-on-the-TV and
: assume they are meant for you. Mike, this is called paranoia.

But that's the way real abuse works, too. People interject words and
phrases into what they say which they know will have meaning for the listener.

And sometimes, they make it obvious. The very first evening of my job in
Oxford, we went for a drink with the technical director, and a couple
of other employees. The TD said in an "as-if" aside to one of the others,
"Is this the bloke who's been on TV?" (he said it directly in front of
me, and obviously meant mke to hear him saying it). The other person
replied, "Yes, I think so".

I think the subtext of what the TD said was "Why are they bothering with
him? He's so insignificant, why would they possibly want to spend the
resources going after him and putting all that expensive technology in
his home, when there must be much better targets?". The Technical
Director was given to sometimes disrespecting people, you see, and in my
case he couldn't see the point of anyone expending money on harassing me.


Subject: Re: Treatment of Schizophrenia
Newsgroups: uk.misc,,uk.politics,alt.politics.british
Followup-To: uk.misc,,uk.politics,alt.politics.british
References: < > <4lge6r$>
Organization: Toronto Free-Net

Illtud Daniel ( wrote:
: Probably 'cos you come across as reasoned & articulate, it's a pity
: about the other stuff :)

Veracity is so unreasonable.

: >>pps. You should still see a doc again Mike.
: >
: >Doing so. Trouble is, all this mental-illness stuff provides camouflage
: >for the harassment, which is real. It alows people who otherwise would
: >consider the harassment seriously to disregard it. It makes conversations
: >with a lawyer or police brief when otherwise it would merit discussion.

: The point is that there are two possibilities happening here-

: 1. There's a large conspiracy of people out to get you, for no
: other reason than that they have the means to do so, and that
: it involves a lot of the Media & a proportion of the public

: 2. You (who admit to having some headspace problems) are suffering
: from acute paranoid schizophrenia.

: Possibility #1 is _possible_, but would be unprecendented (OTOH,
: how would we know?), unfeasible, and many other things beginning
: with _un_ which I can't think of at the moment. Besides, if there
: was something going on, chances are some of us here would know
: about it, and I'm convinced that nobody does.

"Unprecedented" hits the nail on the head. It _is_ unprecedented, but we
have only just reached the technical stage at which it is feasible, and
we know video-spying is done to other people (NB the Diana-Hewitt
episode) and is a routine tool of security agencies.

Perhaps what is unprecedented is not the technical side, but the social
manipulation of many people by a concealed element in what other
countries would be called the secret police. The most disturbing element
is the degree to which people allow themselves to be unquestioningly
manipulated by an evil element within the state.


Posted via - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
------- >>>>>><<<<<<------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access

Date: 19 Aug 2007 14:59:35
From: Robert Harmon
Subject: Re: thoughts on pressure
Damn Ken, switch to single malt, it befuddles the brain less than whatever
you're consuming! Very few will still be working but there are many
exceptions? Which is it to be my friend, few or many?

> As a matter of genuine fact, *very few* espresso machines at any price
> level will still be in operation after even a decade, although there are
> *many exceptions*.

Date: 19 Aug 2007 15:43:42
From: Ken Fox
Subject: Re: thoughts on pressure
The fact that you can find 20 year old espresso machines for sale on ebay,
that might work well with restoration, says nothing about what becomes of
the typical machine. It is rare to find commercial machines in service in
actual business locations after they reach a certain age, certainly less
than 10 years. This is because the cost of the machine is a relatively
small fraction of the cost of running a cafe or other business that uses
commercial machines to make coffee drinks, and when you start paying for
parts and labor to fix them as they age, it often is cheaper just to replace
them. Some of these used commercial machines do get refurbished, but I have
been to dealers who take trade ins and seen rows of machines in the back
that are going out . . . . to the recycler or junkyard. They do not find
repairing them to be economically reasonable in spite of the fact that
someone such as yourself might be willing to spend tens or hundreds of hours
without compensation doing it for yourself, as a hobby.

With home machines there are certainly talented individuals who will keep
their equipment running for very long periods of time, but a lot of such
machines get tossed out in the trash or end up in the basement as never to
be used again "spare machines" after a certain point.


"Robert Harmon" < > wrote in message
> Damn Ken, switch to single malt, it befuddles the brain less than whatever
> you're consuming! Very few will still be working but there are many
> exceptions? Which is it to be my friend, few or many?
> {;-)
> --
>> As a matter of genuine fact, *very few* espresso machines at any price
>> level will still be in operation after even a decade, although there are
>> *many exceptions*.