coffee-forum.net
Promoting coffee discussion.



Main
Date: 24 Jun 2006 13:39:10
From:
Subject: fed up with Ken and Randy's holier than thou attitude about coffee


What makes you think I'm a troll? Just because I, along with many
others, are fed up with Ken and Randy's holier than thou attitude about
coffee?

Their condescending attitudes towards others who are just starting out?

What goes around comes around, and Randy and Ken are getting their due
worth. It is about time someone knock them off their high stool.

Marty





 
Date: 24 Jun 2006 23:56:09
From: Hugh Jass
Subject: Re: fed up with Ken and Randy's holier than thou attitude about coffee


Agreed 100%!

For the most part, Jim Schulman is the only one here that knows anything.
The rest of these phucktards are just a bunch of snobs that like to brag
about their expensive foreign espresso machines.

.
<martyminor11@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:1151181550.832122.220820@y41g2000cwy.googlegroups.com...
> What makes you think I'm a troll? Just because I, along with many
> others, are fed up with Ken and Randy's holier than thou attitude about
> coffee?
>
> Their condescending attitudes towards others who are just starting out?
>
> What goes around comes around, and Randy and Ken are getting their due
> worth. It is about time someone knock them off their high stool.
>
> Marty
>




  
Date: 24 Jun 2006 23:34:10
From: ensenadajim
Subject: Re: fed up with Ken and Randy's holier than thou attitude about coffee


On Sat, 24 Jun 2006 23:56:09 -0400, "Hugh Jass" <* > wrote:

>Agreed 100%!
>
>For the most part, Jim Schulman is the only one here that knows anything.
>The rest of these phucktards are just a bunch of snobs that like to brag
>about their expensive foreign espresso machines.
>
>.
><martyminor11@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:1151181550.832122.220820@y41g2000cwy.googlegroups.com...
>> What makes you think I'm a troll? Just because I, along with many
>> others, are fed up with Ken and Randy's holier than thou attitude about
>> coffee?
>>
>> Their condescending attitudes towards others who are just starting out?
>>
>> What goes around comes around, and Randy and Ken are getting their due
>> worth. It is about time someone knock them off their high stool.
>>
>> Marty
>>
>


And you are the sock puppet of which of the two morons you are
defending?

Yes, they are opinionated. So what? If you, or the morons, cannot
handle it, filter their posts out. Simple solution and one I picked so
simple minds can handle it.

I have my differences with some of their postings, but I would not
ever stoop to the level of accusing them of writing so much just so
they can get their sig line(s) published.

If you had an ounce of intelligence, even you would have to agree that
that position is bone-headed stupidity or penis envy.


jim



   
Date: 25 Jun 2006 08:35:31
From: Ken Fox
Subject: Re: fed up with Ken and Randy's holier than thou attitude about coffee


"ensenadajim" <ensenadaXXXjim@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:acbs92pfekvjfnlc2knthk8vl71rqq2vfg@4ax.com...
> >
>
> And you are the sock puppet of which of the two morons you are
> defending?

no, it is all the same person, who has maybe 40-50 fake posting names by
this point and keeps creating new ones.





    
Date: 25 Jun 2006 09:03:59
From: Max
Subject: Re: fed up with Ken and Randy's holier than thou attitude about coffee


>> And you are the sock puppet of which of the two morons you are
>> defending?

Ken Fox wrote:
> no, it is all the same person, who has maybe 40-50 fake posting names by
> this point and keeps creating new ones.

Ken -

You think martyminor11@yahoo.com, daveb and Hugh Jass are the same
person? Examine the headers of their posts and you'll see that's
very unlikely.

Your contention that someone is using "40-50 fake posting names"
is bordering on paranoia.



     
Date: 25 Jun 2006 11:14:41
From: Ken Fox
Subject: Re: fed up with Ken and Randy's holier than thou attitude about coffee


use of spoofing, anonymizer.com , similar "services," more than one computer
or connection, there are scads of ways to do this. Perhaps you are 51

ken

"Max" <max@no_spam.org > wrote in message
news:oabt92l94ekgfbg5am6l39ejbs1bqku669@4ax.com...
>>> And you are the sock puppet of which of the two morons you are
>>> defending?
>
> Ken Fox wrote:
>> no, it is all the same person, who has maybe 40-50 fake posting names by
>> this point and keeps creating new ones.
>
> Ken -
>
> You think martyminor11@yahoo.com, daveb and Hugh Jass are the same
> person? Examine the headers of their posts and you'll see that's
> very unlikely.
>
> Your contention that someone is using "40-50 fake posting names"
> is bordering on paranoia.
>




     
Date: 25 Jun 2006 09:53:33
From: Randy G.
Subject: Re: fed up with Ken and Randy's holier than thou attitude about coffee


Max <max@no_spam.org > wrote:

>>> And you are the sock puppet of which of the two morons you are
>>> defending?
>
>Ken Fox wrote:
>> no, it is all the same person, who has maybe 40-50 fake posting names by
>> this point and keeps creating new ones.
>
>Ken -
>
>You think martyminor11@yahoo.com, daveb and Hugh Jass are the same
>person? Examine the headers of their posts and you'll see that's
>very unlikely.
>
>Your contention that someone is using "40-50 fake posting names"
>is bordering on paranoia.
>

Ya, Ken. I've told you a million times, don't exaggerate! ;-)

Randy "don't feed the troll anything other than rat poison" G.
http://www.EspressoMyEspresso.com




     
Date: 25 Jun 2006 14:02:55
From: Steve Ackman
Subject: Re: fed up with Ken and Randy's holier than thou attitude about coffee


In <oabt92l94ekgfbg5am6l39ejbs1bqku669@4ax.com >, on Sun, 25 Jun 2006
09:03:59 -0700, Max wrote to KF:

> Your contention that someone is using "40-50 fake posting names"
> is bordering on paranoia.

Default User/RoqueJa/TooMuchCoffeeMan/CoffeeMex/etc.........
has certainly used at least "40-50 fake posting names."
No paranoia necessary.

Some of them might more accuarately be referred to as
"variations" rather than "different names," but the
number is in no way an overstatement.



      
Date: 25 Jun 2006 16:46:42
From: Default User
Subject: Re: fed up with Ken and Randy's holier than thou attitude about coffee


On Sun, 25 Jun 2006 14:02:55 -0400, Steve Ackman
<steve@SNIP-THIS.twoloonscoffee.com > wrote:

>In <oabt92l94ekgfbg5am6l39ejbs1bqku669@4ax.com>, on Sun, 25 Jun 2006
>09:03:59 -0700, Max wrote to KF:
>
>> Your contention that someone is using "40-50 fake posting names"
>> is bordering on paranoia.
>
> Default User/RoqueJa/TooMuchCoffeeMan/CoffeeMex/etc.........
>has certainly used at least "40-50 fake posting names."
>No paranoia necessary.
>


Well, stevie, I know it gets hard it must be for you to count when
you run out of fingers. But, what I don't understand is that you
still had at least one to go on your counting hand and you still lost
track.

I seem to remember hearing about a primitive people whose counting
system went: "1, 2, 3, lots." Is that your tribe?





       
Date: 25 Jun 2006 20:43:20
From: Steve Ackman
Subject: Re: fed up with Ken and Randy's holier than thou attitude about coffee


In <038u925rmf94tt8n380cfm9b91kg5li7to@4ax.com >, on Sun, 25 Jun 2006
16:46:42 -0700, Default User wrote:

<ad hominem snipped >

I doubt you even know how many pseudonyms you've
used. How long have you been posting on alt.coffee
anyway?


       
Date: 25 Jun 2006 17:59:49
From: Ken Fox
Subject: Re: fed up with Ken and Randy's holier than thou attitude about coffee


"Default User" <default.user@default.cmx > wrote in message
news:038u925rmf94tt8n380cfm9b91kg5li7to@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 25 Jun 2006 14:02:55 -0400, Steve Ackman
> <steve@SNIP-THIS.twoloonscoffee.com> wrote:
>
>>In <oabt92l94ekgfbg5am6l39ejbs1bqku669@4ax.com>, on Sun, 25 Jun 2006
>>09:03:59 -0700, Max wrote to KF:
>>
>>> Your contention that someone is using "40-50 fake posting names"
>>> is bordering on paranoia.
>>
>> Default User/RoqueJa/TooMuchCoffeeMan/CoffeeMex/etc.........
>>has certainly used at least "40-50 fake posting names."
>>No paranoia necessary.
>>
>
>
> Well, stevie, I know it gets hard it must be for you to count when
> you run out of fingers. But, what I don't understand is that you
> still had at least one to go on your counting hand and you still lost
> track.
>
> I seem to remember hearing about a primitive people whose counting
> system went: "1, 2, 3, lots." Is that your tribe?
>
>
>

Not only does this unfortunate individual use an incredible number of
aliases, but he obviously has them on more than one newsreader or computer
system so that when you try to killfile him it is a continuing process since
you must killfile the same fake posting names over and over again.

Fortunately, his posting style and use of language is obvious so he's easy
to spot. Unfortunately (for him) this seems to be the most productive thing
he can find to fill up his time.




   
Date: 25 Jun 2006 13:32:19
From: Hugh Jass
Subject: Re: fed up with Ken and Randy's holier than thou attitude about coffee


I am a sock puppet for the truth!

"ensenadajim" <ensenadaXXXjim@yahoo.com > pulled his typing finger out of his
nose and wrote in message news:acbs92pfekvjfnlc2knthk8vl71rqq2vfg@4ax.com...

> blah blah blah yada yada yada snip
>
>
> And you are the sock puppet of which of the two morons you are
> defending?
>
> more blah blah blah snipped
>
> jim
>




    
Date: 25 Jun 2006 13:56:34
From: Craig Andrews
Subject: Re: fed up with Ken and Randy's holier than thou attitude about coffee



"Hugh Jass" <* > wrote in message news:e7mhb601uo@news4.newsguy.com...
>I am a sock puppet for the truth!
>
> "ensenadajim" <ensenadaXXXjim@yahoo.com> pulled his typing finger out
> of his nose and wrote in message
> news:acbs92pfekvjfnlc2knthk8vl71rqq2vfg@4ax.com...
>
>> blah blah blah yada yada yada snip
>>
>>
>> And you are the sock puppet of which of the two morons you are
>> defending?
>>
>> more blah blah blah snipped
>>
>> jim
>>
>
>

http://www.edthesock.com/ {:-D
Craig.



     
Date: 25 Jun 2006 21:19:05
From: Hugh Jass
Subject: Re: fed up with Ken and Randy's holier than thou attitude about coffee


LOL

"Craig Andrews" <alt.coffee@deletethis.rogers.com > wrote in message
news:4g812fF1lkf63U1@individual.net...
>
> http://www.edthesock.com/ {:-D
> Craig.




 
Date: 24 Jun 2006 16:06:13
From:
Subject: Re: fed up with Ken and Randy's holier than thou attitude about coffee



I- >Ian wrote:
> Ignored
>
> On 24 Jun 2006 13:39:10 -0700, martyminor11@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> >What makes you think I'm a troll? Just because I, along with many
> >others, are fed up with Ken and Randy's holier than thou attitude about
> >coffee?
> >
> >Their condescending attitudes towards others who are just starting out?
> >
> >What goes around comes around, and Randy and Ken are getting their due
> >worth. It is about time someone knock them off their high stool.
> >
> >Marty

If you read it, it ain't ignored.

Marty



 
Date: 24 Jun 2006 21:16:41
From: I->Ian
Subject: Re: fed up with Ken and Randy's holier than thou attitude about coffee


Ignored

On 24 Jun 2006 13:39:10 -0700, martyminor11@yahoo.com wrote:

>What makes you think I'm a troll? Just because I, along with many
>others, are fed up with Ken and Randy's holier than thou attitude about
>coffee?
>
>Their condescending attitudes towards others who are just starting out?
>
>What goes around comes around, and Randy and Ken are getting their due
>worth. It is about time someone knock them off their high stool.
>
>Marty


 
Date: 24 Jun 2006 13:52:54
From: ensenadajim
Subject: Re: fed up with Ken and Randy's holier than thou attitude about coffee


On 24 Jun 2006 13:39:10 -0700, martyminor11@yahoo.com wrote:

>What makes you think I'm a troll? Just because I, along with many
>others,


Oh my, you have a moiuse in your pocket.


>are fed up with Ken and Randy's holier than thou attitude about
>coffee?

"Holier than thou?" You must be a long, LOOOONG way down the feeding
chain if that is what you think.



>Their condescending attitudes towards others who are just starting out?

Both were a great help to me when I first started out.



>What goes around comes around, and Randy and Ken are getting their due
>worth. It is about time someone knock them off their high stool.

And time for you to go sit in the corner with a dunce cap on. But if
you want to persist in you pissing contest, I would suggets you
re-aim, you have been peeing down your own leg.


jim



 
Date: 25 Jun 2006 07:52:17
From:
Subject: Re: fed up with Ken and Randy's holier than thou attitude about coffee



Ken Fox wrote:
> "ensenadajim" <ensenadaXXXjim@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:acbs92pfekvjfnlc2knthk8vl71rqq2vfg@4ax.com...
> > >
> >
> > And you are the sock puppet of which of the two morons you are
> > defending?
>
> no, it is all the same person, who has maybe 40-50 fake posting names by
> this point and keeps creating new ones.

Hey Kenny,

I hope you are not insinuating me in the above post. If you are you
are entirely wrong. But then again you cannot fathom that more than
one person thinks you and Randy "I eat Coffee Cherries by the peck" G.
are a couple of self-congratulatory doinks.

Marty



 
Date: 25 Jun 2006 05:49:26
From: daveb
Subject: Re: fed up with Ken and Randy's holier than thou attitude about coffee


WOW. tough talk!

but beyond that, I'm not gonna say a thing (for once)


Dave "vy6tbd5yfv5hhxdss" b

martyminor11@yahoo.com wrote:
> Hugh Jass wrote:
> > Agreed 100%!
> >
> > For the most part, Jim Schulman is the only one here that knows anything.
> > The rest of these phucktards are just a bunch of snobs that like to brag
> > about their expensive foreign espresso machines.
> >
> > .
>
> Yes, Jim is a class act. Randy "I Pick my Own Beans for Best Quality"
> G. can learn alot from him, especially along the lines of being modest.
>
> Marty



 
Date: 24 Jun 2006 23:36:57
From:
Subject: Re: fed up with Ken and Randy's holier than thou attitude about coffee



Hugh Jass wrote:
> Agreed 100%!
>
> For the most part, Jim Schulman is the only one here that knows anything.
> The rest of these phucktards are just a bunch of snobs that like to brag
> about their expensive foreign espresso machines.
>
> .

Yes, Jim is a class act. Randy "I Pick my Own Beans for Best Quality"
G. can learn alot from him, especially along the lines of being modest.

Marty



 
Date: 25 Jun 2006 13:38:25
From: daveb
Subject: Re: fed up with Ken and Randy's holier than thou attitude about coffee


All of it useful input.



Steve Ackman wrote:
> In <oabt92l94ekgfbg5am6l39ejbs1bqku669@4ax.com>, on Sun, 25 Jun 2006
> 09:03:59 -0700, Max wrote to KF:
>
> > Your contention that someone is using "40-50 fake posting names"
> > is bordering on paranoia.
>
> Default User/RoqueJa/TooMuchCoffeeMan/CoffeeMex/etc.........
> has certainly used at least "40-50 fake posting names."
> No paranoia necessary.
>
> Some of them might more accuarately be referred to as
> "variations" rather than "different names," but the
> number is in no way an overstatement.